L. Jiang, F. Dang, C. Wang, B. Pan, Y. Zhou, C. Zhou | 2026 | Construction and Building Materials
DOI 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2026.146401Review state
Last reviewed
Not reviewed yet
Last approved reanalysis
No approved reanalysis yet
This paper evaluates the high and low temperature performance of bricks made with lunar regolith simulant HUST-2 under three temperature cycling modes. It reports changes in porosity, pore size, specific heat capacity, and thermal conductivity, highlighting the impact of temperature cycling on microstructure and thermal properties. The paper discusses the evaluation of bricks made from lunar regolith simulants under thermal cycling conditions. It outlines the methodology, results, and implications for future lunar construction. The study investigates the effects of different thermal cycling modes on samples, including high-temperature, low-temperature, and combined high-low temperature cycling. The samples are labeled HUST-2-H, HUST-2-L, HUST-2-C, and HUST-2-B. The study includes analysis of mass change, density change, XRD patterns, scanning electron microscope observations, and various thermal properties such as thermal diffusion coefficient, specific heat capacity, and thermal conductivity. The results show that the samples experience changes in dimensions and properties under thermal cycling, with cracks forming during high-temperature cycling and pores remaining largely unchan
These are the records this paper contributes to the simulant, returned sample, method, and property browsers.
No returned samples extracted yet.
Thermal cycling
Thermal cycling
Dimensional analysis
Dimensional analysis
Mass and density change analysis
Mass and density change analysis
XRD analysis
XRD analysis
Scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis
Scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis
High-temperature cycling (HUST-2-H)
thermal cycling
Low-temperature cycling
thermal cycling
Combined high and low temperature cycling
thermal cycling
Mass change
Varies with the number of cycles
Density change
Varies with the number of cycles
Porosity
16.74%
Average pore size
4.28 m
Specific heat capacity
15-20% increase
Thermal conductivity
improved
compressive strength
not specified
elastic modulus
calculated from stress and strain during compression test