P. T. Metzger | 2024 | Icarus
DOI 10.1016/j.icarus.2024.116135Review state
Last reviewed
Not reviewed yet
Last approved reanalysis
No approved reanalysis yet
This paper discusses the erosion rate of lunar soil under a landing rocket, focusing on benchmarking and predictions. It references Apollo landing data and uses models derived from Apollo measurements and Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) Diviner thermal inertia measurements to calibrate an erosion equation. The study suggests that about 4 to 10 times more soil was blown in each Apollo landing than previously believed, highlighting potential sandblasting damage. The provided text appears to be a series of URLs related to an article or document, likely from a scientific or technical journal. The URLs are formatted as API endpoints for retrieving content, possibly from Elsevier's platform. The text does not contain any meaningful content or data that can be summarized directly. It is likely a technical artifact or a fragment of a larger document retrieval system. This paper presents a theoretical prediction of dust opacity and erosion rates caused by landing rockets on the Moon. It compares empirical data to theoretical models and discusses the integration of these models over the entire landing trajectory. The study is supported by NASA grants and references various prior research
These are the records this paper contributes to the simulant, returned sample, method, and property browsers.
No simulants extracted yet.
SVG File Identifier Extraction
Pattern Recognition
Academic Publication Supplement Identification
Contextual Analysis
Dust opacity in lunar landings
Modeling | Erosion rate calibration
Optical density prediction for Apollo 16 landing
Prediction | Erosion efficiency calibration
Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC)
Thermal properties | Erosion rate modeling
High-temperature concentric cylinder viscometry
Thermal properties | Thermal inertia modeling
Erosion brightness curve analysis
Erosion modeling | Erosion rate prediction
Thermal inertia model
Thermal properties | Thermal inertia analysis
File Type
SVG (Scalable Vector Graphics)
Context
Academic or Technical Publication
Erosion rate
4 to 10 times more soil was blown in each Apollo landing than previously believed times more soil
Erosion efficiency
fraction of energy at the bottom of the laminar sublayer converted into mechanical work lifting the grains fraction
Porosity
62%
Thermal inertia
Thermal inertia model
Erosion threshold
E th, 0
Erosion rate
m 0