C. S. Sandeep, V. Marzulli, F. Cafaro, K. Senetakis, T. Pöschel | 2019 | Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
DOI 10.1029/2019jb017589Review state
Last reviewed
Not reviewed yet
Last approved reanalysis
No approved reanalysis yet
This paper investigates the micromechanical behavior of DNA 1A lunar regolith simulant compared to Ottawa sand. It reports on hardness, surface roughness, normal contact stiffness, interparticle friction angles, and fits theoretical models to experimental data. The study aims to understand the mechanical response of the simulant for lunar settlement applications. The study investigates the interparticle contact behavior of DNA 1A lunar regolith simulant using a custom-built micromechanical loading apparatus, comparing results with Ottawa sand (OS) and theoretical models. DNA 1A, derived from ash, has a specific gravity of 2.70 and particle sizes between 1.00-1.80 mm. Chemical analysis via EDS shows DNA 1A is rich in SiO2 (51.87%) and has low Fe2O3 (8.30%), contrasting with Ottawa sand (98.12% SiO2, 0.23% Fe2O3). SEM images reveal DNA 1A grains are subprismoidal with sharp corners, while Ottawa sand grains are more rounded. The study highlights the importance of particle morphology and composition in understanding regolith behavior. This paper compares the micromechanical behavior of DNA 1A lunar regolith simulant with Ottawa sand, focusing on surface roughness and microhardness. Su
These are the records this paper contributes to the simulant, returned sample, method, and property browsers.
No returned samples extracted yet.
micromechanical loading apparatus
micromechanical testing
normal contact micromechanical tests
micromechanical testing
tangential contact micromechanical tests
micromechanical testing
theoretical models
model fitting
Micromechanical Loading Apparatus
Experimental
Theoretical Models
Theoretical
Microhardness test
mechanical
Surface roughness comparison
comparison
hardness
lower
surface roughness
higher
normal contact stiffness
lower
interparticle friction angles
higher
plastic displacements
observed
elastic displacements
dominant
friction values
greater
softer behavior
observed