P. Nieke, J. Kita, M. Häming, R. Moos | 2019 | Materials
DOI 10.3390/ma12030487Review state
Last reviewed
Not reviewed yet
Last approved reanalysis
No approved reanalysis yet
This paper examines the feasibility of using Aerosol Deposition (AD) to produce dense thick films of lunar regolith simulant EAC-1 at room temperature. The study investigates the processability of EAC-1 by AD, producing films with thicknesses between 2.50 m and 5.36 m on steel substrates. The films are analyzed using Laser Scanning Microscopy (LSM) and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), with measurements of roughness and Vickers hardness. This paper describes the manufacturing of dense thick films of lunar regolith simulant EAC-1 at room temperature using aerosol deposition (AD). The simulant's chemical composition and particle size distribution are analyzed, and mechanical properties such as roughness, hardness, and film thickness are measured. The study aims to test the processability of lunar dust simulant in a laboratory environment for ISRU applications. This paper describes the characterization and film deposition of EAC-1 lunar regolith simulant. SEM images show particle size variation and irregular morphology. Sieving reduced large particles, but some remained due to high aspect ratio. Films were successfully deposited using AD method on stainless steel substrates, with sh
These are the records this paper contributes to the simulant, returned sample, method, and property browsers.
No returned samples extracted yet.
Aerosol Deposition (AD) method
coating process
Aerosol deposition (AD) of EAC-1
film manufacturing
Roughness measurement of EAC-1
characterization
Film thickness measurement of EAC-1
characterization
Cross-section preparation of EAC-1
characterization
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of EAC-1
characterization
SEM imaging of EAC-1 powder
characterization
Particle size distribution analysis
characterization
roughness
higher
hardness
higher
thickness
2.50 m to 5.36 m
area
25 10 mm 2
roughness
measured using waveline w20 profilometer
film thickness
measured at 8 positions per sample
microhardness
measured using fischerscope h100
cross-section morphology
analyzed using scanning electron microscopy