Measurement linked to Experiment, with source literature and related extracted records kept visible.
100%
Confidence
12
Literature sources
21
Linked simulants
157
Linked properties
Measurement type
Measurement
Application
Experiment
Primary source
Comparison of spatial data acquisition techniques for the geometric analysis of lunar regolith
Review state
needs review
Table 5 Angles of repose () of the Chenobi cone. Device used 0L 0R 45L 45R 90L 90R 135L 135R Mean Std. HLS 43.9 43.5 44.0 41.9 41.5 42.0 42.2 44.8 43.0 1.1 Photogrammetry 44.1 43.5 44.1 41.7 41.6 44.
The angles of repose were calculated by fitting a line into each of the eight sets of points, and then determining the angle of repose for these lines based on their parameters.
The effect of particle size distribution on lunar regolith simulant angle of repose
The results from this study indicate that there is likely an optimal amount of lunar regolith fines that should be included within a structure to maximize its integrity, while preventing an excess of
d simulant (JLU-H). Since the mechanical response of compacted lunar simulants significantly differs from that of loose media, conventional angle of repose or penetration tests are inadequate for c...
2.5 Physical test of angle of repose of JLU-H
nar simulants. Properties investigated include mineralogical and chemical composition, particle size distribution, density, shear strength, angle of repose, mass flow rates, and abrasivity. Results...
The diameter of the platform was also shown to affect the static angle of repose, suggesting that geometric boundary conditions influence heap formation and should be considered in future studies.
X. Sun, R. Zhang, X. Li, M. Zou, H. Zhang | 2026 | Powder Technology
DOI 10.1016/j.powtec.2025.122070X. Sun, R. Zhang, H. Zhang, Z. Hu, W. Wang, M. Zou | 2025 | Advances in Space Research
DOI 10.1016/j.asr.2024.09.031J. M. Long-Fox, Z. A. Landsman, P. B. Easter, C. A. Millwater, D. T. Britt | 2023 | Advances in Space Research
DOI 10.1016/j.asr.2023.02.034F. Wylęgała, T. Uhl | 2026 | Acta Astronautica
DOI 10.1016/j.actaastro.2025.11.007J.-T. Kim, T.-K. Yeu, Y.-J. Park | 2025 | Advances in Space Research
DOI 10.1016/j.asr.2025.03.024T. Matsushima, J. Katagiri, K. Uesugi, A. Tsuchiyama, T. Nakano | 2009 | Journal of Aerospace Engineering
DOI 10.1061/(asce)0893-1321(2009)22:1(15)V. S. Engelschiøn, S. R. Eriksson, A. Cowley, M. Fateri, A. Meurisse, U. Kueppers, M. Sperl | 2020 | Scientific Reports
DOI 10.1038/s41598-020-62312-4S. Province, W. Engineering, X. Engineering, T. Engineering | 2018 | Stavební obzor - Civil Engineering Journal
DOI 10.14311/cej.2018.02.0017J. Patzwald, R. Kleba-Ehrhardt, T. Griemsmann, N. Nowaczyk, S. Linke, L. Overmeyer, E. Stoll, D. Karl | 2025 | Planetary and Space Science
DOI 10.1016/j.pss.2025.106189G.-E. Battsengel, N. Melkoumian, D. Harvey, R. Akmeliawati | 2026 | Geosciences
DOI 10.3390/geosciences16060219100%
12 sources